From FragoriaWiki
consumers can also take a step back
protagonist Japanese fast food giant admitted using a" pig soup fine blending soup and consumers apology, deep soy milk door "fast food" Big Mac "KFC also apologized to consumers and soymilk making process will clearly inform the bulletin board in the country all restaurants. Than in front of the relevant departments irrefutable evidence is still refusing to acknowledge its forged part of the furniture origin, also refused to consumers return required by Leonardo da Vinci furniture "apology" ended with "soup door" and "soy milk door", it seems that there are a few points "happy" taste: businesses take a step back,the interests of human, apologize,hollister uk, consumers can also take a step back,unable to quell all the contradictions, forgave this end up. However, this food safety event really should be on this "full stop" it Food safety incidents behind the frequent "regulatory passive" nothing to fear "loophole" is part of the enterprise. Shuanghui the finish people TUC apologized media reported earlier, law enforcement intervention after the situation,hollister deutschland, once deep "clenbuterol pork scandal" painless comeback, recently again broke many "quality gate" ,louboutin pas cher. This long-term disregard the interests of consumers,toms outlet, but it was still able to wander freely outside the supervision of the relevant departments,hollister, the shocking lack of regulatory initiative. Appropriate punitive damages system is not set up the moment food safety events frequently nothing important reason. As pointed out by Marx in "Das Kapital": "If 10% of the profits, capital guaranteed everywhere to be used; 20% of the profits,jimmy choo uk, capital active; 50% of the profits,abercrombie milano, you take the risk of capital,abercrombie pas cher; order 100 % profit, capital dare to trample on all human laws,abercrombie; 300% of the profits, capital would dare to commit any crime, and even take to twist the head of danger. "legal deterrent enough trustworthy lose the trust of the cost is very low cost, even The well-known brand, the lure of profits, but also to take the risk, holding "as long as it is not to be found like" was found, but lose some money, "" lose money apology settled "mentality,abercrombie paris, and trample the rights and interests of consumers. Meanwhile, consumers "Forgetfulness" unwitting "Pushing Hands" damage to their own interests,louboutin. Despite a more than 82,700 users participated in the vote,hollister, 93.6% of respondents Ajisen Ramen will not go to lunch "However, in contrast to several food safety scandals has been discovered Nestle achieved in fiscal year 2010 of $ 35.8 billion net profit, compared with more than twice the growth of the 2009 fiscal year, the visible consumer "forgetful" ultimately only a long break faith with enterprises "ambition", to put an end to their own interests,abercrombie. The issue of food safety is not a simple corporate responsibility,due to traffic jams, can not completely rely on existing laws and regulations and regulatory constraints to completely resolve,hollister, but have a specialized government agencies to manage social forces to supervise the formation of a complete three-dimensional multidimensional regulatory oversight system, can really eat safe, eat at ease. "</p>
